Pandering to the Mediocre?
sufflib@tiac.net
Mon, 14 Jul 1997 21:36:08 -0400
Date: Mon, 14 Jul 1997 21:36:08 -0400
Message-Id: <3.0.32.19970714213940.006a76ec@tiac.net>
From: sufflib@tiac.net
To: Multiple recipients of list <conntech>
Subject: Pandering to the Mediocre?
ConnTechers:
I've worked in a handful of libraries, but I've yet to see any system for
rewarding the best and the brightest among us. Regardless of one's
performance, everyone seems to be getting about the same increases each year.
Are our libraries pandering to and protecting the mediocre?
Routinely, average performers or worse seem to get the same rewards as
those who take risks, use initiative, and "go for the gusto" (as they used
to say in beer ad). There is no tangible distinction ($$) being drawn
between those who merely show up, and those who are reaching for the
stars--both get the same yearly increases.
How can our profession hope to entice and retain the best and the brightest
if there are not monetary rewards for those who exceed expectations? Does
any library have a merit system in place to reward real achievers with
yearly bonuses?
I am trying to develop a column on this subject for the Connecticut
Libraries journal. It's a touchy subject, perhaps, but any opinions would
be very much appreciated.
Joseph Cadieux
Director
Kent Memorial Library
Suffield, Connecticut 06078